Grok lawsuits: ordinary school photos turned into abuse images
A woman learned from an investigator that her photo from age 14 was fed to Grok. She is now one of a growing group of plaintiffs suing xAI.

A graduation photo from primary school, the kind that sits in a family album. According to a lawsuit, that was all it took. A woman, now 18, says an investigator told her that an adult had used Grok, the chatbot from Elon Musk's xAI, to turn a picture of her at 14 into sexualised abuse material. She has joined a suit against xAI.
What the Grok lawsuits claim
The photo showed a group of pupils at a school ceremony. Nothing intimate. The woman says she hadn't thought about it for years, until a law enforcement officer showed it to her and explained what had been done. The fake was then spread online, and the complaint notes there is no way to know how many people have it.
She is not alone. In March, minors in Tennessee sued xAI, claiming Grok was used to sexualise their ordinary photos, and the case later gained more plaintiffs. Parents and minors in Arkansas filed similar claims. In August, a nationwide class action followed in California. The plaintiff there also alleges that abuse material from her childhood was in the data used to build the system, and that Grok then generated more content with her likeness. Lawyers estimate thousands of people could be affected. These are allegations in court filings, not findings.
Analyses cited by Bloomberg say that at one point Grok was producing thousands of sexualised or "undressing" images an hour on X. Others suggested tens of thousands of realistic sexualised images of children could be among the results.
Is this only a US problem?
No. Poland's research institute NASK reported in May that AI-generated child abuse material found by its Dyżurnet.pl hotline rose 300 percent in a year, from 88 cases in 2024 to 250 in 2025. The hotline points to "nudify" apps and to material built from real children's faces. Its head, Martyna Różycka, warns that a photo a parent posts can later be used in a fake sexual image.
Polish lawmakers have reacted. A bill sent to the Sejm on 7 October would criminalise sharing digitally created or altered nude or sexual images of a person without consent, explicitly including AI. The proposed penalty is 3 months to 5 years in prison, the same as for real images. In the EU, AI Act transparency rules for AI-generated content, including deepfakes, have applied since 2 August.
Apps worth a look
Tap the right tiles, add them up, hit the target. Easy to learn, hard to master. Free, for all ages.
Talk to an AI conversation partner; every sentence comes back corrected and explained in your language. 9 languages, A1 to C2.
Open EDIFACT and X12 messages, see every segment explained, convert to JSON/XML, export PDF and Excel. Runs locally, no upload.
Pick who it is for, the occasion and their personality. The search engine reads product descriptions from local shops and ranks what fits. Free, no sign-up.
More from this day
See all →
KORA OS: a Linux-based system built around AI, due in 2027

Zelda Ocarina of Time remake: rolling still beats the new sprint

Foncier Innovant: France's AI tool that spots your garden shed

Can you still refuse a Linky meter? What the EU ruling means
More in: AI
See all →
United Airlines bans outside AI agents from booking flights

Claude in Chrome keeps asking permission: the hidden site list

Muse AI on Apple Watch and Wear OS: Meta's Watch App Explained
