Osegi
Science·2 min read

Graham's 55-Year-Old Rearrangement Conjecture Is Finally Solved

A group of young mathematicians has proved Ronald Graham's 1971 rearrangement conjecture, a puzzle possibly inspired by juggling, using randomness and collaboration.

Colorful juggling balls in mid-air arcs overlaid with a clock face and numbers, illustrating a mathematical rearrangement puzzle.
Image: WIRED

Mathematicians have solved a puzzle that stood open for 55 years. Graham's rearrangement conjecture, posed in 1971 by Ronald Graham, was resolved in a proof spanning four papers. The last one, by Lisa Sauermann of the University of Bonn and Huy Tuan Pham of the University of Chicago, appeared in February 2026 and officially closed the problem.

A question that may come from juggling

Graham was both president of the American Mathematical Society and of the International Jugglers' Association. His question: take a set of different nonzero integers. Can you always reorder them so that every partial sum (the first two numbers, the first three, and so on) is different? In juggling terms, if each ball stays airborne for a different time, can you find a throwing order so that no two balls land on the same beat?

For positive numbers the answer is obviously yes, and it is also known for mixed positive and negative numbers. Graham asked about numbers on a clock, where values repeat after a prime number p. He conjectured the answer is still yes, in line with how valid sudoku boards or Latin squares exist despite many constraints.

Randomness and an unlikely team

The difficulty depends on the size of the set relative to p. In 2022, Alp Müyesser of Oxford and Alexey Pokrovskiy of University College London handled sets containing almost every number up to p. They set a few numbers aside, scrambled the rest randomly, and used the spare numbers to repair any stretch that summed to zero.

Unaware of that work, Noah Kravitz of Oxford found the conjecture in an online archive of unsolved problems. With Benjamin Bedert, he solved the case where the set is tiny compared to p, such as 100 numbers with p at 1 billion, and posted it in September 2024. Müyesser then joined them, with two other colleagues, and their August 2025 paper covered more of the large-set cases. A gap remained for medium-size sets, which Sauermann and Pham later closed.

Noga Alon of Princeton credited "the power of collaboration, the power of the young generation, the power of probabilistic methods." Kravitz noted that the team combined people from areas of combinatorics that rarely work together.

Apps worth a look

SUMO: the number puzzle

Tap the right tiles, add them up, hit the target. Easy to learn, hard to master. Free, for all ages.

Tags:mathematicsgraham conjecturecombinatoricsronald grahamprobabilistic methods

More from this day

See all →

More in: Science

See all →